Threat Intelligence Analysis
Review relevant threat information to understand potential adversaries, campaigns, techniques and indicators applicable to your organisation.
Build a more informed view of potential cyber threats through relevant intelligence, hypothesis-driven hunting and investigation of suspicious activity. Petabyte's Threat Intelligence & Hunting services help security teams explore signals, examine context and identify opportunities to improve detection.
Discuss Your RequirementsSecurity alerts provide useful signals, but they may not explain the broader context of a potential threat. Threat intelligence helps teams understand relevant adversary activity, while threat hunting investigates hypotheses and behaviours that may not be identified through existing alerts alone.
Petabyte's Threat Intelligence & Hunting service supports structured investigation using available telemetry, relevant threat information and agreed analytical methods. The scope can be tailored to your environment, security objectives and data sources.
Threat hunting is an investigative activity, not a guarantee that every threat will be found. Outcomes depend on available telemetry, scope, techniques and evidence.
Combine relevant threat context with structured investigation to help understand suspicious activity and identify security improvement opportunities.
Review relevant threat information to understand potential adversaries, campaigns, techniques and indicators applicable to your organisation.
Develop investigation hypotheses and examine available security telemetry for behaviours that may warrant further analysis.
Review relevant indicators and behavioural patterns within the context of available logs, endpoint data and other agreed sources.
Identify opportunities to refine detection logic, improve telemetry coverage and address relevant investigation gaps.
Examine suspicious findings, correlate available evidence and support decisions on appropriate investigation or escalation.
Document relevant observations, investigation findings and recommendations to inform security operations and improvement planning.
Structured hunting helps analysts define what they are looking for, test a hypothesis against available data and determine what the evidence supports.
Define a threat scenario or suspicious behaviour based on relevant intelligence, known techniques or environmental context.
Identify suitable data sources and examine available telemetry relevant to the investigation question.
Correlate observations, investigate anomalies and assess whether the evidence supports further action.
Document conclusions and identify potential improvements to detection rules, telemetry or investigation procedures.
The engagement is scoped around relevant threat questions, available data sources and the security outcomes your team wants to investigate.
Agree the investigation scope, threat questions, priorities and available data sources.
Review relevant threat context and conduct the agreed analysis against available telemetry.
Record observations, supporting evidence, investigation limitations and relevant conclusions.
Identify relevant detection, monitoring or response improvements based on the findings.
Common questions about proactive investigations and threat context.
Threat intelligence is analysed information about potential cyber threats, adversaries, campaigns, indicators and techniques. It helps security teams understand context and make more informed decisions.
Threat hunting is a proactive investigation process in which analysts examine available data for evidence of suspicious or potentially malicious activity that may not have triggered existing alerts.
Security monitoring generally evaluates telemetry and alerts against configured detection logic. Threat hunting uses defined hypotheses and investigative analysis to explore potential activity that may not be apparent through routine alerting.
Depending on the investigation, useful sources may include endpoint telemetry, identity and authentication logs, network records, cloud logs and SIEM data. Available sources affect the depth and scope of analysis.
No. Findings depend on the investigation scope, data quality, telemetry coverage and the activity being examined. An investigation may also identify visibility or detection gaps without confirming malicious activity.
Hunting findings can inform detection tuning, new detection hypotheses, telemetry improvements and investigation procedures. Any implementation work should be agreed as part of the engagement.
Discuss your threat intelligence needs, investigation priorities and available security telemetry with Petabyte.